Claude Fable 5
Anthropic's June 9, 2026 frontier model — Fable 5 (GA, `claude-fable-5`, $10/$50 per MTok) and Mythos 5 (same model, safeguards lifted, restricted to vetted cyber/bio partners). Closed weights, API-only. SOTA on nearly all tested benchmarks. Per [Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5).
Summary
Anthropic's June 9, 2026 frontier model — Fable 5 (GA, `claude-fable-5`, $10/$50 per MTok) and Mythos 5 (same model, safeguards lifted, restricted to vetted cyber/bio partners). Closed weights, API-only. SOTA on nearly all tested benchmarks. Per [Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5).
The frontier anchor on the site's cost-of-inference axis — the closed, expensive top tier that the open floor (DeepSeek V4 and peers) is measured against. Its $10/$50 price is what makes the open floor economically decisive for the high-volume inference sitting next to your object store; the frontier is reserved for the rare hard autonomous job.
- It is API-only and closed — do not file it with the self-hostable open models in this section; its presence is as a contrast, not a local-first option.
- Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are the same underlying model; the difference is safeguards + access, not capability.
- "SOTA on nearly all benchmarks" is from Anthropic's own announcement; treat as vendor-reported until third-party evals land.
- Its classifiers route ~95% of sessions down to Opus 4.8 — the headline price applies to the hard minority, so blended real-world cost depends on routing.
competes_withDeepSeek V4 — the frontier-vs-floor contrast that defines the 2026 inference split.constrained_byHigh Cloud Inference Cost — its $10/$50 price is the ceiling the open floor undercuts ~23–57×.scoped_toAI Runtime Infrastructure — a model-class node on the runtime/cost axis, not a storage primitive.
Definition
Anthropic's June 9, 2026 frontier release. **Claude Fable 5** is a Mythos-class model at general availability (model id `claude-fable-5`, **$10/M input, $50/M output**); **Mythos 5** is the same underlying model with safeguards lifted, restricted to authorized cybersecurity (Project Glasswing) and biomedical-research partners under a trusted-access program. **Closed weights, API-only** — the structural opposite of the self-hostable open models that fill the rest of this section. State-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks; Stripe reported it compressed a **50-million-line Ruby migration from two months to one day**, and Mythos-5 protein-design partners reported roughly **10× drug-design acceleration**. Per [Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5).
Fable 5 is the **frontier anchor** of the 2026 cost-capability split this index maps. It does not run next to your object store — it's a rented API — but it defines the top tier the open floor ([DeepSeek V4](/node/deepseek-v4) and peers) is measured against. Its $10/$50 price point is what makes the floor *economically decisive*: at roughly **23× the input and 57× the output cost** of open weights, the frontier is reserved for the rare hard autonomous job, while the high-volume inference that actually touches your buckets — tagging, classification, retrieval, lifecycle — runs on the floor. Tellingly, Fable 5's own classifiers route the easy **~95% of sessions down to Claude Opus 4.8**, reserving the full model for the hard minority — the same difficulty-routing the market is doing across two vendors, done inside one product.
The hard, rare, high-stakes work where a few points of capability decides feasibility — large autonomous code migrations, novel agentic builds, frontier reasoning over long context; explicitly **not** the commodity data-plane inference that belongs on the open floor.
Recent developments
- Launched June 9, 2026 — SOTA on nearly every tested benchmark. Highest-scoring frontier model on Cognition's FrontierCode eval and Hebbia's senior-level Finance Benchmark; strong on complex vision tasks (extracting numbers from scientific figures, rebuilding web-app source from screenshots) and extended autonomous reasoning. Per Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5.
- Fable 5 (GA) vs Mythos 5 (restricted) split. Same underlying model; Fable 5 ships with AI classifiers (cyber / bio-chem / distillation misuse) that fall back to Opus 4.8 on <5% of sessions, and survived 1,000+ hours of external red-teaming with "no universal jailbreaks." Mythos 5 lifts safeguards for vetted cyber/bio partners and mandates 30-day retention. Per Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5.
- Pricing $10/$50 per M; free on Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise through June 22, 2026, then usage-credit metered. API id
claude-fable-5. Per Anthropic — Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5. - Suspended June 12, restored July 1–2 under an emergency export-control order. Days after launch, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued an emergency export-control directive after Amazon researchers demonstrated a jailbreak that bypassed the model's cybersecurity safeguards to identify vulnerabilities and generate exploit code. With no way to verify user nationality at commercial API scale, Anthropic globally suspended both Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for 19 days. Controls were lifted June 30 after negotiations and new safety classifiers; global access was restored July 1–2. Per Anthropic — Statement on the US directive to suspend access, Anthropic — Redeploying Claude Fable 5, and AP News — restrictions lifted.
- New refusal-and-reroute fallback — and it changes the bill. Post-restoration, a prompt that trips the hardened cybersecurity or bio-hazard classifiers is intercepted, returns
stop_reason: "refusal", and is automatically routed to the older Claude Opus 4.8 — with the customer billed at the lower Opus rate for the redirected request. For anyone metering spend against Fable 5, effective cost now depends on how often traffic trips the classifiers. Per Anthropic — Redeploying Claude Fable 5 and Anthropic — More on Fable's cyber safeguards and jailbreak framework. - A published jailbreak-severity framework (4 axes). Anthropic released a consensus framework scoring jailbreaks on capability gain (uplift), breadth (universality), ease of weaponization, and discoverability — the governance scaffolding behind the reroute behavior. Per Anthropic — jailbreak framework.
- Data-infra profile: 1M-token context, 128K output, always-on "Adaptive Thinking" — but a 30-day retention floor. Fable 5 defaults to a 1,000,000-token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens, and its Adaptive Thinking continuously verifies outputs against live system state. Critically for regulated data pipelines, the model now mandates a 30-day data-retention window for safety monitoring, precluding zero-data-retention (ZDR) deployments — a hard sovereignty barrier that pushes the most sensitive S3-adjacent workloads toward self-hosted open models. Per Claude Platform Docs — Introducing Fable 5 and Mythos 5.
Connections 4
Outbound 3
scoped_to1competes_with1constrained_by1Inbound 1
competes_with1